🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I usually shied away from heavy use of luck during my D&D games. I tended was for the plot and session development to be guided by character actions as opposed to random chance. That said, I decided to try something different, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A popular podcast utilizes a DM who frequently requests "chance rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a specific dice and assigning consequences tied to the roll. This is fundamentally no distinct from consulting a pre-generated chart, these are devised in the moment when a character's decision lacks a clear resolution.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own game, mainly because it looked novel and provided a break from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the perennial dynamic between planning and randomization in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional In-Game Example

At a session, my party had survived a massive battle. When the dust settled, a player inquired after two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Rather than deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This triggered a deeply poignant sequence where the characters came upon the remains of their companions, forever united in death. The cleric held funeral rites, which was uniquely significant due to earlier story developments. In a concluding reward, I improvised that the remains were suddenly transformed, containing a spell-storing object. By chance, the item's magical effect was exactly what the group needed to solve another major situation. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of serendipitous moments.

Honing DM Agility

This experience caused me to question if randomization and making it up are in fact the beating heart of this game. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Groups frequently find joy in ignoring the most detailed plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to adapt swiftly and create scenarios in real-time.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to train these skills without straying too much outside your usual style. The trick is to deploy them for low-stakes situations that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. As an example, I would not employ it to decide if the main villain is a secret enemy. Instead, I might use it to determine whether the party reach a location just in time to see a critical event occurs.

Empowering Collaborative Storytelling

Luck rolls also serves to keep players engaged and cultivate the feeling that the adventure is alive, progressing based on their decisions as they play. It reduces the feeling that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby strengthening the collaborative foundation of storytelling.

This philosophy has always been part of the game's DNA. Early editions were reliant on random tables, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. While contemporary D&D frequently emphasizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Finding the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly no issue with doing your prep. However, there is also no issue with letting go and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Control is a big factor in a DM's role. We use it to manage the world, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, in situations where doing so could be beneficial.

The core advice is this: Do not fear of temporarily losing the reins. Try a little chance for minor details. It may create that the organic story beat is far more powerful than anything you could have scripted by yourself.