🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect similar debates in additional EU countries